FED and ECB on divergent paths
Interest rate markets are now pricing in a 74% probability the US Federal Reserve starts the interest rate normalisation process at its 15/16th December meeting. But before then the European Central Bank is widely expected to step up its easing efforts in the face of low growth and weak inflation expectations when it meets later this week.
In comments reminiscent of his game-changing 2012 do “whatever it takes” to save the Euro, ECB President Mario Draghi has committed the central bank to do “what we must” to achieve its inflation target in the face of low inflation expectations and growth that remains too low to put any significant upward pressure on inflation.
Further action therefore appears more than likely when the Governing Council meets on December 3rd. That could include one, some or all of: cutting the already negative deposit rate, increasing the quantum of the current asset purchase programme or extending the duration of the programme beyond its scheduled finish of September next year.
The euro is currently trading at its lowest level in eight months, indicative of market expectations of meaningful action from the ECB this week. The risk then is the Council reads too much into recent better data and underdelivers. Our read of the data is that it appears consistent with trend GDP growth, which we put at around 1.5% per annum. The problem is the Eurozone needs a decent burst of above trend growth to absorb the still significant spare capacity across the region, the most obvious example of which is the still high unemployment rate of 10.8%. Monetary policy can’t do that by itself.
After delaying the start of the interest rate normalisation process in September, markets are now pricing in a 74% chance of the Fed lifting interest rates off zero at their December meeting. Only an atrociously bad payrolls report this weekend appears likely to derail the Fed from what will be their first interest rate hike in nine years.
Markets seem more comfortable with the prospects of higher interest rates now than they were prior to the September meeting. This is likely a combination of factors, including the growing understanding that interest rate increases are likely to be only gradual and fears of a hard landing in China (and global growth) have receded. So the fact the Fed didn’t hike in September for all the reasons they stated to some extent turns a December hike into a good news story!
As we have consistently argued, it’s the pace of interest rate increase and the peak (terminal rate) in rates that are more critical for markets than the timing of the start of the process. Assuming the Fed start to raise rates in December, we expect the Fed funds rate to be around 1.00-1.25% by December 2016. Furthermore we expect the Fed will continue to lower its estimate of the neutral rate from the current 3.75% towards our estimate of 3.0%.
The path of the USD will be a critical part of the outlook for interest rates. History shows us that the exchange rate does most of its work in anticipation of higher interest rates – the classic case of “buy the rumour, sell the fact”. That said, the fact that the Fed and the ECB (along with the BoJ and the PBoC, among others) are on divergent monetary policy paths, will limit the extent to which the Fed can tighten.
USD: 3 months before/after rate hike
Source: AMP Capital
This blog post has been prepared to provide general information and does not constitute 'financial advice' for the purposes of the Financial Advisors Act 2008 (Act).
An individual investor should, before making any investment decisions, consider the information available in the relevant Product Disclosure Statement and seek professional advice.
While every care has been taken in the preparation of this document, AMP Capital Investors (New Zealand) Limited and the AMP Group (together, 'AMP') make no guarantee that the information supplied is accurate,
complete or timely and do not make any warranties or representations in respect of results gained from its use.
The information is not intended to infer that current or past returns are indicative of future returns. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of AMP.
These views are subject to change depending on market conditions and other factors.
Post a comment